How is the driver wrong? if your life and family life is being threaten you have the right to defend yourself and get away from the situation. They started slashing his tires what should he do still stay there like a c.unt?The driver is wrong. Feeling threatened isnt a reason to to lash out LIKE THAT. This the kind of isht that got Trayvon killed. I'm sorry that this #################### threshold for a threat is what some folks call a discussion between men. Should have manned up... Bunch of Bikers on a major highway gonna beat you, common guy. Situational accessment is needed... You just ran over a friend and yet your still not been shot yet. what does that say bout the Bikers, to me, it says much more bout them than you (driver) you twat.
Article 35 NYS Penal LawDoes that article even makes sense HB?
If tires were slashed when he was stop for hitting the initial biker, how would the driver manage to drive 3+ mile at high speed after he ran over 3 biker to get out the crowd.
the driver as well as the bikers should be all brought up on charges...The driver used his vehicle as a weapon, because he was in fear...he wasn't being attacked when the initial accident happen, to use self defense as an argument to drive over 3 bikers. The drivers actions were wreckless, bring him up on charges and let a jury acquitt him.
6. A person may, pursuant to the ensuing provisions of this article,
use physical force upon another person in self-defense or defense of a
third person, or in defense of premises, or in order to prevent larceny
of or criminal mischief to property, or in order to effect an arrest or
prevent an escape from custody. Whenever a person is authorized by any
such provision to use deadly physical force in any given circumstance,
nothing contained in any other such provision may be deemed to negate or
qualify such authorization.