Women being secretly video taped, on train, bus etc

LIONESS onda RISE

Registered User
U see how far u gone? Thats y i didnt say much about it because the more u talk the more idiotic u look. I started off in this thread laffing, but when reading the personal comments of some who has been affected by men who have done that, it is when i didnt continue to joke. Certain topics that may be sensitive to som its best to leave alone. I never seen shortsweetness post so much in a thread if it isnt sports so evidently its an issue that bothers her.

All i said was what is the point of bring in different points and debating nonsense when the fact is men who do X are X. Buh u iz one ah dem fellas who does talk cause u have a mouth. If my comment didnt apply to u then u should have let it go..but maybe i should use ur philosophy and say u are defending all men in here because u beggin prick.
:kiss:
 

Alpha Unit

Insurgent
Why, MUST he agree with the men? :confused
Did he disagree or just say we eh bound to go into that?

U see how far u gone? Thats y i didnt say much about it because the more u talk the more idiotic u look. I started off in this thread laffing, but when reading the personal comments of some who has been affected by men who have done that, it is when i didnt continue to joke. Certain topics that may be sensitive to som its best to leave alone. I never seen shortsweetness post so much in a thread if it isnt sports so evidently its an issue that bothers her.

All i said was what is the point of bring in different points and debating nonsense when the fact is men who do X are X. Buh u iz one ah dem fellas who does talk cause u have a mouth. If my comment didnt apply to u then u should have let it go..but maybe i should use ur philosophy and say u are defending all men in here because u beggin prick.
Dan it seem you taking this more seriously than me oui lol. So let me put forth a serious response. I understand it bothers SS and I wasn't trying to do anything else initially more than make a comment. All of a sudden it became some form of defense when it never was. SS and her mom isn't the norm (at least I doubt it) and as a matter of fact I didn't even address her. I responded to chinks and I clearly stated it wasn't illegal when it seemed that some was drifting into believing it was. If you have knowledge about something and you see someone going off I see it as a duty to steer them back in the right direction which is what I attempted to do. Then SS gave details and I discussed that situation and it still not being illegal. Just because I elected to say that everyone needs to be responsible and they not likely to make the highlight reel all of a sudden I defending.

You've been on here long enough to know that I doh leh nobody incorrectly label me or twist what I say into something else. I never defend nobody actions and never said anything about it was good, ok, or should be ignored by any party in here. So as long as they continue with that asshole talk about excuses, defend and justify, I will respond because that was never what i was doing. I understand why you said what you said and normally I would easily acquiesce but i eh about to ha nobody talkin no shit bout how I was defendin no form ah bullshit. So who feel they now have ammo good fuh dem. i doh shy away from wha I do. The pic of the girl who works in my building was posted for a specific reason and it was never nothing sexual. when SS ask if I ever I answered and said exactly what I do, does that pic somehow fall outside those realms? I don't think so.

:rofl: Dead @ beggin prick. As fockin if ewww
 

Naughtyshawtie

Self Made
U see how far u gone? Thats y i didnt say much about it because the more u talk the more idiotic u look. I started off in this thread laffing, but when reading the personal comments of some who has been affected by men who have done that, it is when i didnt continue to joke. Certain topics that may be sensitive to som its best to leave alone. I never seen shortsweetness post so much in a thread if it isnt sports so evidently its an issue that bothers her.

All i said was what is the point of bring in different points and debating nonsense when the fact is men who do X are X. Buh u iz one ah dem fellas who does talk cause u have a mouth. If my comment didnt apply to u then u should have let it go..but maybe i should use ur philosophy and say u are defending all men in here because u beggin prick.

10 possi points for TMAKKA.....
 
Did he disagree or just say we eh bound to go into that?



Dan it seem you taking this more seriously than me oui lol. So let me put forth a serious response. I understand it bothers SS and I wasn't trying to do anything else initially more than make a comment. All of a sudden it became some form of defense when it never was. SS and her mom isn't the norm (at least I doubt it) and as a matter of fact I didn't even address her. I responded to chinks and I clearly stated it wasn't illegal when it seemed that some was drifting into believing it was. If you have knowledge about something and you see someone going off I see it as a duty to steer them back in the right direction which is what I attempted to do. Then SS gave details and I discussed that situation and it still not being illegal. Just because I elected to say that everyone needs to be responsible and they not likely to make the highlight reel all of a sudden I defending.

You've been on here long enough to know that I doh leh nobody incorrectly label me or twist what I say into something else. I never defend nobody actions and never said anything about it was good, ok, or should be ignored by any party in here. So as long as they continue with that asshole talk about excuses, defend and justify, I will respond because that was never what i was doing. I understand why you said what you said and normally I would easily acquiesce but i eh about to ha nobody talkin no shit bout how I was defendin no form ah bullshit. So who feel they now have ammo good fuh dem. i doh shy away from wha I do. The pic of the girl who works in my building was posted for a specific reason and it was never nothing sexual. when SS ask if I ever I answered and said exactly what I do, does that pic somehow fall outside those realms? I don't think so.

:rofl: Dead @ beggin prick. As fockin if ewww
*Sigh*

I am willing to leave this alone now. We simply have different opinions on how this went down and our definition of defending/justifying something is different. We are not going to see eye to eye and there is no point in us continuing to go back and forth. I said what I had to say; you said what you had to say. The End.
 

Alpha Unit

Insurgent
*Sigh*

I am willing to leave this alone now. We simply have different opinions on how this went down and our definition of defending/justifying something is different. We are not going to see eye to eye and there is no point in us continuing to go back and forth. I said what I had to say; you said what you had to say. The End.
I can easily live with that.
 

iPicong

New member
ah fraid tuh even answer now......but my stance does not apply to women who are dressing responsibly........it applies to exhibitionists.........and nobody responded to my post where I said Carnival pics should not be given a pass on.......a perv is a perv and women well know they on full display during this time and if they choose to take that "risk" then present themselves as proper as possible so that pics of their pegs or nipples not on full display......i will repeat...this does not apply to women who are properly dressed and are victimized......as for what shortsweet was also talking about with camerman dont give them a pass either.........any and every body are given media passes and are not professional cameramen........imix gallery is proof of that
 

Alpha Unit

Insurgent
ah fraid tuh even answer now......but my stance does not apply to women who are dressing responsibly........it applies to exhibitionists.........and nobody responded to my post where I said Carnival pics should not be given a pass on.......a perv is a perv and women well know they on full display during this time and if they choose to take that "risk" then present themselves as proper as possible so that pics of their pegs or nipples not on full display......i will repeat...this does not apply to women who are properly dressed and are victimized......as for what shortsweet was also talking about with camerman dont give them a pass either.........any and every body are given media passes and are not professional cameramen........imix gallery is proof of that
Yuh former IMPD padna go take ah tun in yuh ass, yuh go ahead :kicks
 

Poca

Registered User
So if some decide to "expose" themselves, why not simply look and keep moving? And why not ask to film or take pictures? Then, you'll know if they simply want to be looked at or filmed.

To me this whole thing is like men who feel the need to run down the street and try in all ways possible to talk to women. Really there's no need to be extra.
 

iPicong

New member
So if some decide to "expose" themselves, why not simply look and keep moving? And why not ask to film or take pictures? Then, you'll know if they simply want to be looked at or filmed.

To me this whole thing is like men who feel the need to run down the street and try in all ways possible to talk to women. Really there's no need to be extra.
the average man and woman have a little perv in them and will look and keep going......the dudes who go further with their actions is what i believe you angry females in here are talking about.....im sure you have taken a little peek here and there on the streets Poca
 
B

Black Madonna

Guest
*lights a prayer candle* Heavenly father, may some of these men have their likeness appear on a gay porn pic/video site for fags to jerk off to. Allow them to feel what it is to feel violated so they they may gain an understanding of women. In Jesus name I pray....AMEN
 
Top